<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting the Most Out of WordCamp</title>
	<atom:link href="/2009/05/getting-the-most-out-of-wordcamp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordcampmidatlantic.com/2009/05/getting-the-most-out-of-wordcamp/</link>
	<description>The WordPress Event in the Capital Region</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:45:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim WIndsor</title>
		<link>http://wordcampmidatlantic.com/2009/05/getting-the-most-out-of-wordcamp/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim WIndsor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordcampmidatlantic.com/?p=159#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Thinking minimally-intrusive hashtags, is there any reason why not to use #wcma instead of #wordcampmidatl? It seems unused at the moment, and saves 10 precious characters of the 140....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking minimally-intrusive hashtags, is there any reason why not to use #wcma instead of #wordcampmidatl? It seems unused at the moment, and saves 10 precious characters of the 140&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->